Skip to main content

No publicity, please!

So, last week I did a firewalk for charity, at Edinburgh Zoo. Due to the 'delightful' roadworks going on in Edinburgh for, ohhh, eternity, I arrived at the event at 7pm just as the briefing started, instead of the planned 6.30pm for registration.

Apparently, in the few minutes before the briefing officially started, it was announced that a daily news show crew were there to film us, and if anyone objected to being filmed, could they make themselves known. It seems like nobody did, because we were all filmed by the crew at various points, usually in the background to the presenter.

I have absolutely no desire to be on TV, particularly during a stressful event, so I was not best chuffed to find out by questioning other firewalkers that what I thought was perhaps going to be a promotional clip for the company organising the firewalk, or for the Zoo itself was actually going to end up on national telly. Added to this was the fact that I had not been asked about my agreement to the filming, and had not given permission either verbally, or in writing.

I've viewed the report, and can clearly see myself at one point, although others might not recognise me. I have no way of knowing what other footage that I may have been in was cut.

So, my questions are...
Since I was repeatedly filmed in a private place (the seminar room of the Zoo) without my permission, could I justifiably have objected to the use of the footage?
Is the firewalk area of the Zoo (a grassy public area in the middle, after opening hours of the Zoo) also a private area?
Is it legal to film people like this when they haven't given any sort of proveable agreement?

It's a moot point now, as the footage is out there, but it's something that annoyed me, as I think you can tell!!


Anonymous said…
Main issues here:
Are there contractual rights to photograph you?
What is a public place?
If it was public did you have a legitimate expectation of privacy?
Ditto, to some extent, in a 'private' place.

From an English law perspective I'd want to know:
Did the agreement with the promoters have a publicity clause? Did you make yourself known when they asked for objections? If so did they film you anyway?
Permission, england, sought or given need not be in writing - oral is sufficient.

In the seminar room, and in the absence of a contract and prior notification of filming: possibly.

Privacy right in the Firewalk area?: Very doubtful. Still essentially 'public' even though it was after hours & by invitation only.

Generally proveable agreement is helpful: the absence of it is not definitive is saying whether there is a right to film or not. General privacy law would apply.
Dumpling said…
I couldn't make my objection known, as when they asked, not all participant (me included) had arrived yet. So they asked a majority of participants to agree on behalf of everyone, including, apparently, total strangers who were not in the room, and not informed when entering the room of what was going on.

I could not agree to something I had not been asked, yes?

There was no publicity clause - the only doc I completed was a health issues / disclaimer in event of injury doc.

I felt the firewalk area was a public space, but I could feel the lights of the camera panning over the room / me when we had been told to close our eyes for a visualisation exercise in the seminar room - to think you're being filmed in that situation, without permission, then to find it may be on TV...not nice, hence my discomfort.
Anonymous said…
"I could not agree to something I had not been asked, yes?" no. Ad since no contract could be a problem: they could argue it was implicit but that seems dubious.

I think in terms of the seminar room you'd have an arguable legal claim. In the Firewalk area I'd say you hadn't.
Dumpling said…
Ok - I'll be smug now in the knowledge that what they did was naughty! :D

Popular posts from this blog

What's in a name?

In the case of this blog, it's a name that had no particular thought or planning behind it - I had no idea whether I would actually want to keep it going, what I would blog about, or that anyone would ever read it. Well, it's almost 4 years later (17th June 2007 is blog birthday, if we're counting), and the blog's still here, so I think we can now safely assume that it's probably going to be sticking around. And the name's been getting on my nerves a have no idea the amount of people who have found this blog looking for ladies called Jennie Law or Jenny Law. Personally, I'm not actually called Jennie Law, so I'm no help to these poor searchers, although for the right fee I could maybe consider pretending to be... I also don't blog a huge amount about law: I'm not a lawyer, I just have the job of finding stuff for lawyers. Sometimes that process amuses me, sometimes it annoys me, and I blog about it. Sometimes I write about library is

cpd23 Week One - Blogging

So, week one of cpd23 begins, and participants are asked to set up a blog, if they don't already have one. Well, I've had this blog (in it's previous incarnation as "Jennie Law" for four years, so I think I'm good for the "setting up and getting used to blogging" part of Thing One :) I set this blog up originally as just somewhere to share the interesting things I found around the internet, with no real expectation of many others finding or reading it (and hence very little thought about a good name). At the time, there were only one or two other law librarians that I knew of blogging, so it didn't seem like it would be something long term, but for that moment, it felt good to be able to share some random thoughts with other law librarians, and to be able to learn from their blogs. I've stuck with it, despite a few periods of thinking "I've got nothing to say!" (and then finding a month or so later that I suddenly had a flood

Where are the UK Librarian blogs?

In response to various posts wondering about the strange lack of UK library / librarian blogs, I thought I’d have a look for myself to see where they’re all hiding. I did a search on Google Blogs, just using the words “ uk ” and “librarian”, and looked for posts published ‘anytime’, which gave me 24 pages of blog listings. This included spam blogs, duplicate postings, and various sites including ‘ uk ’ in the text of a link they’d posted. I learned a few things in the process. Lots of blogs post occasionally about librarians, without necessarily being written by librarians. If a blogger doesn't fill out their location information, it can be quite hard to work out where they're based without having to read a few posts and look for cultural references. “ UK ” also means "University of Kentucky ” ( See? ). There are quite a few interesting English language library bloggers, but they're not on this list 'cos they ain't in the UK. There really doesn’t