Skip to main content

No publicity, please!

So, last week I did a firewalk for charity, at Edinburgh Zoo. Due to the 'delightful' roadworks going on in Edinburgh for, ohhh, eternity, I arrived at the event at 7pm just as the briefing started, instead of the planned 6.30pm for registration.

Apparently, in the few minutes before the briefing officially started, it was announced that a daily news show crew were there to film us, and if anyone objected to being filmed, could they make themselves known. It seems like nobody did, because we were all filmed by the crew at various points, usually in the background to the presenter.

I have absolutely no desire to be on TV, particularly during a stressful event, so I was not best chuffed to find out by questioning other firewalkers that what I thought was perhaps going to be a promotional clip for the company organising the firewalk, or for the Zoo itself was actually going to end up on national telly. Added to this was the fact that I had not been asked about my agreement to the filming, and had not given permission either verbally, or in writing.

I've viewed the report, and can clearly see myself at one point, although others might not recognise me. I have no way of knowing what other footage that I may have been in was cut.

So, my questions are...
Since I was repeatedly filmed in a private place (the seminar room of the Zoo) without my permission, could I justifiably have objected to the use of the footage?
Is the firewalk area of the Zoo (a grassy public area in the middle, after opening hours of the Zoo) also a private area?
Is it legal to film people like this when they haven't given any sort of proveable agreement?

It's a moot point now, as the footage is out there, but it's something that annoyed me, as I think you can tell!!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Main issues here:
Are there contractual rights to photograph you?
What is a public place?
If it was public did you have a legitimate expectation of privacy?
Ditto, to some extent, in a 'private' place.

From an English law perspective I'd want to know:
Did the agreement with the promoters have a publicity clause? Did you make yourself known when they asked for objections? If so did they film you anyway?
Permission, england, sought or given need not be in writing - oral is sufficient.

In the seminar room, and in the absence of a contract and prior notification of filming: possibly.

Privacy right in the Firewalk area?: Very doubtful. Still essentially 'public' even though it was after hours & by invitation only.

Generally proveable agreement is helpful: the absence of it is not definitive is saying whether there is a right to film or not. General privacy law would apply.
Dumpling said…
I couldn't make my objection known, as when they asked, not all participant (me included) had arrived yet. So they asked a majority of participants to agree on behalf of everyone, including, apparently, total strangers who were not in the room, and not informed when entering the room of what was going on.

I could not agree to something I had not been asked, yes?

There was no publicity clause - the only doc I completed was a health issues / disclaimer in event of injury doc.

I felt the firewalk area was a public space, but I could feel the lights of the camera panning over the room / me when we had been told to close our eyes for a visualisation exercise in the seminar room - to think you're being filmed in that situation, without permission, then to find it may be on TV...not nice, hence my discomfort.
Anonymous said…
"I could not agree to something I had not been asked, yes?" no. Ad since no contract could be a problem: they could argue it was implicit but that seems dubious.

I think in terms of the seminar room you'd have an arguable legal claim. In the Firewalk area I'd say you hadn't.
Dumpling said…
Ok - I'll be smug now in the knowledge that what they did was naughty! :D

Popular posts from this blog

Careering along

When I look around at the activities of information professional groups, it seems that there’s a disparity. There’s quite often a lot of support and funding available for those who’re just starting out in the profession, but a desert of nothingness for those of us who’re “just getting on with it”. If you’re a new professional, you have lots of groups to support you as you progress in your early career, various prize funds available for essay and report writing, access to bursaries for conference attendance, eligibility for awards for being new and enthusiastic. But what do you get when you’re past that bright-eyed-and-bushy-tailed first 5 years (5 years seems to be the approximate cut-off point for becoming “established” and no longer new). What happens when you’ve already received a bursary from an organisation earlier in your career and so wouldn’t be eligible for one now, meaning you’re not able to attend events or training? When you’re heavily involved in a project but not at

What if you don't get back what you put in?

I am, as you may know, a member of CILIP, the professional body for information professionals. There are two main reasons I'm a member. I am a Chartered librarian, and I take my commitment to maintaining this visible badge of my professionalism seriously. I have revalidated my Chartership within the previous assessment system, and I have submitted my Revalidation within the new system. To continue being a Chartered librarian, I must be a member of CILIP (although currently the commitment to continue to revalidate my Chartership is voluntary, and has been so for the length of my membership since approximately 2001). So I continue to be a member. I am a registered CILIP Mentor, and I help to guide those information professionals who are keen to be professionally qualified through the Chartership/professional qualifications process. I could not abandon midway through that process the people who are looking to me for guidance in their professional development. So I continue to be

Losing the professionalism

So, recently, CILIP apparently sent out an email regarding a consultation on a change of brand image, and name. I say apparently, as despite being a member, I never got this email. When I went to the website to log in and check why it wasn't sent to me, it didn't let me log in. I tried a password reset, and that email came through, so it *can* send emails to me...but the password it sent won't let me log in. I’m losing the will to keep trying. Overall, this is kind of symptomatic of how I feel about CILIP, and how useless its IT systems are.... Anyway, the consultation is on changing CILIP’s currently, clunky and meaningless name (picked as the best of a previous bad lot, as David McMenemy showed with this link to the 2000 consultation results ) to something more meaningful and relevant is open. If you want to take part, it’s here . I was a good girl, and pootled over yesterday to take part, and after filling in all the bumph, I got to view the glorious options. Oh. My.