Skip to main content

No publicity, please!

So, last week I did a firewalk for charity, at Edinburgh Zoo. Due to the 'delightful' roadworks going on in Edinburgh for, ohhh, eternity, I arrived at the event at 7pm just as the briefing started, instead of the planned 6.30pm for registration.

Apparently, in the few minutes before the briefing officially started, it was announced that a daily news show crew were there to film us, and if anyone objected to being filmed, could they make themselves known. It seems like nobody did, because we were all filmed by the crew at various points, usually in the background to the presenter.

I have absolutely no desire to be on TV, particularly during a stressful event, so I was not best chuffed to find out by questioning other firewalkers that what I thought was perhaps going to be a promotional clip for the company organising the firewalk, or for the Zoo itself was actually going to end up on national telly. Added to this was the fact that I had not been asked about my agreement to the filming, and had not given permission either verbally, or in writing.

I've viewed the report, and can clearly see myself at one point, although others might not recognise me. I have no way of knowing what other footage that I may have been in was cut.

So, my questions are...
Since I was repeatedly filmed in a private place (the seminar room of the Zoo) without my permission, could I justifiably have objected to the use of the footage?
Is the firewalk area of the Zoo (a grassy public area in the middle, after opening hours of the Zoo) also a private area?
Is it legal to film people like this when they haven't given any sort of proveable agreement?

It's a moot point now, as the footage is out there, but it's something that annoyed me, as I think you can tell!!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Main issues here:
Are there contractual rights to photograph you?
What is a public place?
If it was public did you have a legitimate expectation of privacy?
Ditto, to some extent, in a 'private' place.

From an English law perspective I'd want to know:
Did the agreement with the promoters have a publicity clause? Did you make yourself known when they asked for objections? If so did they film you anyway?
Permission, england, sought or given need not be in writing - oral is sufficient.

In the seminar room, and in the absence of a contract and prior notification of filming: possibly.

Privacy right in the Firewalk area?: Very doubtful. Still essentially 'public' even though it was after hours & by invitation only.

Generally proveable agreement is helpful: the absence of it is not definitive is saying whether there is a right to film or not. General privacy law would apply.
Dumpling said…
I couldn't make my objection known, as when they asked, not all participant (me included) had arrived yet. So they asked a majority of participants to agree on behalf of everyone, including, apparently, total strangers who were not in the room, and not informed when entering the room of what was going on.

I could not agree to something I had not been asked, yes?

There was no publicity clause - the only doc I completed was a health issues / disclaimer in event of injury doc.

I felt the firewalk area was a public space, but I could feel the lights of the camera panning over the room / me when we had been told to close our eyes for a visualisation exercise in the seminar room - to think you're being filmed in that situation, without permission, then to find it may be on TV...not nice, hence my discomfort.
Anonymous said…
"I could not agree to something I had not been asked, yes?" no. Ad since no contract could be a problem: they could argue it was implicit but that seems dubious.

I think in terms of the seminar room you'd have an arguable legal claim. In the Firewalk area I'd say you hadn't.
Dumpling said…
Ok - I'll be smug now in the knowledge that what they did was naughty! :D

Popular posts from this blog

What's in a name?

In the case of this blog, it's a name that had no particular thought or planning behind it - I had no idea whether I would actually want to keep it going, what I would blog about, or that anyone would ever read it. Well, it's almost 4 years later (17th June 2007 is blog birthday, if we're counting), and the blog's still here, so I think we can now safely assume that it's probably going to be sticking around. And the name's been getting on my nerves a bit...you have no idea the amount of people who have found this blog looking for ladies called Jennie Law or Jenny Law. Personally, I'm not actually called Jennie Law, so I'm no help to these poor searchers, although for the right fee I could maybe consider pretending to be... I also don't blog a huge amount about law: I'm not a lawyer, I just have the job of finding stuff for lawyers. Sometimes that process amuses me, sometimes it annoys me, and I blog about it. Sometimes I write about library is

UK librarian blogs - the list so far

I’ve pulled the previous entries into one alphabetical list, with a few categories. Will be back later with more detailed discussion of what I’ve learned by doing this. And, as always, if you know of other librarian blogs, let me know and I’ll add them in! Institutional Library Blogs / Professional Group Blogs aRKive Appears to be the blog of the Reid Kerr College library, or someone related to the Library, but unable to confirm as it doesn’t have any ‘about’ section that I can find. Lots of posts about library topics, books, IT… Brit Lib Blogs Google Group There’s a Google Group for British librarian bloggers! Unfortunately it looks to be pretty much unused at the moment. CILIP Blogs CILIP has various blogs by either staff, or links to relevant blogs, available from the Communities section. Varying levels of activity on these blogs – the PTEG blog has one post from November 2007, while Lyndsay’s CILIP Blog has been going has been going for almost a year, with at le

The mysteries of cataloguing

Cataloguing: an arcane art, where each piece of punctuation is significant, and commas and semi colons are all-powerful. Well, they are in "proper" libraries, where in-depth research of esoteric points goes on, and the precise spelling of Christian names, and information such as when a person lived and died can be crucial in pinpointing obscure facts. Here, we have our own catalogue system. It doesn't have a name, but if it did, it would probably be something along the lines of "I need this book NOW, no I don't care about the precise spelling of the authors middle name, or their date of birth." I know, I know, it's not snappy, but it's accurate. Cataloguing demands are different in a commercial law firm: we don't care about much more than what it's about, who wrote, when, and what jurisdiction it covers. And what we really, really care about is "where the hell is it". Law books are amazing: they have the power to move themselves f