Skip to main content

The fourth thing....eventually.

Ok, I'm late, but I was on holiday last week - I reserve the right to pay not the slightest bit of attention to work-type things while I'm meant to be relaxing. Or in this case, painting, birthday attending, painting, sanding, painting, cleaning, painting, carpet shampooing, painting, and home-for-sale-listing.
I was a bit busy.

So, Twitter, RSS feeds and Pushnote, eh?

I think I've pretty much got a good grip on Twitter - I've been on there 4 years or so, and have built up some good relationships through meeting people on it. From the start, my account has been a protected one, so only those who I approve can read what I tweet, and I don't use my real name, or identify my employer. I did this deliberately - I don't want the personal account that I created (where I am very informal, and more "personal" than anywhere other than Facebook) to be linked to my workplace. I like to have a slight disconnect from my work life: you can find this blog from my Twitter bio, but not the other way around, so you can't find me professionally (here) and then try and know me personally (Twitter).

This means the people I have a relationship with on Twitter are those I feel I can trust, and I can get on well with.

So, when I get follow requests, I go look at their profile, and assess a few things:

  • Do they have a picture? 
No picture, they're just a faceless blob/egg? Marked down!

  • Have they filled out their bio?
Have they given me some sort of information to say who they are/what they like/if it's a work or personal account?

  • Do we share contacts?
If we have mutual contacts, I'm far more likely to allow a follow request, as they've effectively been vetted by others first.

  • Do they actually tweet?
Twitter's a social tool. If the requester's only posted 3 tweets in a week, how am I meant to develop any sort of interaction and relationship with them? If I'm not online when they tweeted those occasional tweets, I'm never going to get the chance to start to chat to them.

  • Do they have a sense of humour?
I talk a lot of nonsense on Twitter. If people want to follow me, they can't be too serious, or they'll end up unfollowing me in irritation at my waffling, and then I'll find out weeks later when I do my occasional check if I've been unfollowed (no point in talking to people that you don't realise can no longer read what you're saying), and I have to unfollow them. Easier to save all that effort by just rejecting the initial request.

Twitter's excellent for me in terms of picking up information: I immediately know the top news and political topics, I follow various useful local information accounts, and I have asked for (and got) some excellent help when needed...but it's not where I go for my professional and in-depth information. For that, I use RSS feeds.

RSS Feeds

I've been using RSS feeds for a few years now, and I pretty much spend a large amount of my day working with them. I currently use Google Reader, after the demise (and too-late rebirth) of Bloglines. I currently have 76 work-related feeds, 40 library feeds (with more library feeds in a second, non-work RSS reader account).  Monitoring and using the information from the work feeds takes up a large amount of my work time, as this information forms the basis of our internal Current Awareness service, a supplement to those provided by the subscription services we purchase. After my week off, my unread items count is sitting at 1000+ (Greader stops listing at 1000, so I have no idea how many actual unread items there are above that), so keeping on top of them is a demanding task.

The feeds are split into Government (a priority to deal with), Legal (second priority - covers Law Society news, legal reporting and discussions etc), Intellectual Property, and Library. Library feeds are read only in bursts, or in breaks - the work items come first. That's also why I moved some Library feeds into a personal Greader account that I use at home...but by the end of a day wrangling feeds, I don't tend to want to look at more at home, so I've started shifting these back to my work Greader account.

I am always looking to find new, useful and reliable source feeds to add to my RSS subscriptions, but I also have to be careful about how I manage them. When I do manage to get it down to zero unread items, within minutes a new item will have appeared, so the temptation to sit and do RSS feed material non-stop to keep the unread items count clear is strong. I have to make sure I don't spend all my time dealing with the constant influx of information there, and ignore it once I've done a certain amount in the morning, and again in the afternoon. In this case, there's no option for me to "mark all as read" (which I do in my personal Greader when they get overwhelming) - I must check all these feeds for relevant information.

RSS feeds are long as you remember not to let them overwhelm you!


To be honest, I'm not even going to look at Pushnote in any detail, it just doesn't have any appeal for me. I'm not a big "work related" websites sharer: perhaps this is a tool more suited to an academic library environment, rather than a commercial one, where the emphasis is on getting things done fast rather than sharing reading material.

I also don't like the idea that Pushnote could share my comments via my feed on Twitter or Facebook. If I occasionally post a link in Twitter or Facebook, it's usually for light entertainment. I don't look at the Shared items option in Google Reader, and I get irritated when other users start bombarding Twitter with their shared items. If I want to know what things and webpages other people like, I'll go looking, or ask them - I object to others choices being foisted onto me, and have unfollowed people on Twitter who did that, so I sure as hell ain't going to start "pushing" my recommendations on anyone else.
I've also read that it's hard to get your account deleted or removed, so for someone who likes to shut down unused accounts, this does not inspire confidence or trust in me. So sorry, but no ta!


Anonymous said…
Oh dear, is pushing shared GReader items through to Twitter really that annoying? I do that quite a lot, hadn't realised I might be inadvertently pissing people off :(
Dumpling said…
@woodsiegirl Not noticed you doing it much, but when peeps do it, it seems to be done as they're going through their feeds, so it's a continuous stream of them/one every few minutes, rather than a few every now and again (which is no different from people copying and pasting a good link).

I may just be a grumpy old woman though :)

Popular posts from this blog

Careering along

When I look around at the activities of information professional groups, it seems that there’s a disparity. There’s quite often a lot of support and funding available for those who’re just starting out in the profession, but a desert of nothingness for those of us who’re “just getting on with it”. If you’re a new professional, you have lots of groups to support you as you progress in your early career, various prize funds available for essay and report writing, access to bursaries for conference attendance, eligibility for awards for being new and enthusiastic. But what do you get when you’re past that bright-eyed-and-bushy-tailed first 5 years (5 years seems to be the approximate cut-off point for becoming “established” and no longer new). What happens when you’ve already received a bursary from an organisation earlier in your career and so wouldn’t be eligible for one now, meaning you’re not able to attend events or training? When you’re heavily involved in a project but not at

What if you don't get back what you put in?

I am, as you may know, a member of CILIP, the professional body for information professionals. There are two main reasons I'm a member. I am a Chartered librarian, and I take my commitment to maintaining this visible badge of my professionalism seriously. I have revalidated my Chartership within the previous assessment system, and I have submitted my Revalidation within the new system. To continue being a Chartered librarian, I must be a member of CILIP (although currently the commitment to continue to revalidate my Chartership is voluntary, and has been so for the length of my membership since approximately 2001). So I continue to be a member. I am a registered CILIP Mentor, and I help to guide those information professionals who are keen to be professionally qualified through the Chartership/professional qualifications process. I could not abandon midway through that process the people who are looking to me for guidance in their professional development. So I continue to be

Losing the professionalism

So, recently, CILIP apparently sent out an email regarding a consultation on a change of brand image, and name. I say apparently, as despite being a member, I never got this email. When I went to the website to log in and check why it wasn't sent to me, it didn't let me log in. I tried a password reset, and that email came through, so it *can* send emails to me...but the password it sent won't let me log in. I’m losing the will to keep trying. Overall, this is kind of symptomatic of how I feel about CILIP, and how useless its IT systems are.... Anyway, the consultation is on changing CILIP’s currently, clunky and meaningless name (picked as the best of a previous bad lot, as David McMenemy showed with this link to the 2000 consultation results ) to something more meaningful and relevant is open. If you want to take part, it’s here . I was a good girl, and pootled over yesterday to take part, and after filling in all the bumph, I got to view the glorious options. Oh. My.