Skip to main content

Does the BBC hate librarians?

From some of its headlines in the last week, you'd be forgiven for thinking the answer is "yes"!

First up was this delightful individual, who they (and other news sites) decided to label as a "librarian" of child pornography images. The original source of the word librarian seems to come from the quote at the bottom of the page:

Det Chief Supt Mark Braithwaite, from Cleveland Police, said Thompson had been "a critical piece of this network".
"He was the librarian/warehouseman for a myriad of images that were distributed to like-minded individuals both in this country and elsewhere."
Also, a second quote from a different source in a Reuters UK report:

"He was a senior administrator for a pedophile website and was effectively a librarian for the storing and distribution of indecent images of children," Detective Sergeant Rebecca Driscoll said outside court.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but what he was doing (as stated above) is storing and distributing those images.  He's not cataloguing them, tagging them, organising them. He's not a qualified librarian, he has no library work experience, he doesn't currently work in a library, he doesn't do information research, he doesn't work in any way like that which would be recognised as a librarian. So why the BBC decided to use the word "librarian" to describe him, I do not know! Is it because it's more recognisable than "warehouseman"? Others have protested too about this twisting of the word which should be describing an information professional. As they say, as if our profession doesn't have enough problems with trying to project a good / modern image, now it's getting this unpleasant connotation too?

But, yes, fair enough, the BBC are merely quoting police sources, so why have I decided the BBC's got it in for us this week?

Well, it's down to another sloppy headline: "Library error halts wind inquiry".
There was no error by the library involved, or the staff...the error was on the Scottish Borders Council's part, yet the BBC still manages to make it appear as though a library was responsible for a costly delay in a public enquiry.  


Come on BBC, what have you got against librarians this week? Your reporting's getting almost as sloppy as this Times report of legal bloggers (more on that later)!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's in a name?

In the case of this blog, it's a name that had no particular thought or planning behind it - I had no idea whether I would actually want to keep it going, what I would blog about, or that anyone would ever read it. Well, it's almost 4 years later (17th June 2007 is blog birthday, if we're counting), and the blog's still here, so I think we can now safely assume that it's probably going to be sticking around. And the name's been getting on my nerves a bit...you have no idea the amount of people who have found this blog looking for ladies called Jennie Law or Jenny Law. Personally, I'm not actually called Jennie Law, so I'm no help to these poor searchers, although for the right fee I could maybe consider pretending to be... I also don't blog a huge amount about law: I'm not a lawyer, I just have the job of finding stuff for lawyers. Sometimes that process amuses me, sometimes it annoys me, and I blog about it. Sometimes I write about library is

Losing the professionalism

So, recently, CILIP apparently sent out an email regarding a consultation on a change of brand image, and name. I say apparently, as despite being a member, I never got this email. When I went to the website to log in and check why it wasn't sent to me, it didn't let me log in. I tried a password reset, and that email came through, so it *can* send emails to me...but the password it sent won't let me log in. I’m losing the will to keep trying. Overall, this is kind of symptomatic of how I feel about CILIP, and how useless its IT systems are.... Anyway, the consultation is on changing CILIP’s currently, clunky and meaningless name (picked as the best of a previous bad lot, as David McMenemy showed with this link to the 2000 consultation results ) to something more meaningful and relevant is open. If you want to take part, it’s here . I was a good girl, and pootled over yesterday to take part, and after filling in all the bumph, I got to view the glorious options. Oh. My.

cpd23 Week One - Blogging

So, week one of cpd23 begins, and participants are asked to set up a blog, if they don't already have one. Well, I've had this blog (in it's previous incarnation as "Jennie Law" for four years, so I think I'm good for the "setting up and getting used to blogging" part of Thing One :) I set this blog up originally as just somewhere to share the interesting things I found around the internet, with no real expectation of many others finding or reading it (and hence very little thought about a good name). At the time, there were only one or two other law librarians that I knew of blogging, so it didn't seem like it would be something long term, but for that moment, it felt good to be able to share some random thoughts with other law librarians, and to be able to learn from their blogs. I've stuck with it, despite a few periods of thinking "I've got nothing to say!" (and then finding a month or so later that I suddenly had a flood