Well, apparently, according to the recent Times article.
The only problem is, Alex Wade doesn't seem to have bothered actually doing any proper research. They've decided that only staff at law firms are likely to blog, or have any knowledge of the law, thereby ruling out advocates / barristers, academic law professionals, support staff / librarians, students.... There are lots of law blogs out there, by all sorts of people working in the law, all it takes to find them is a few minutes!
I randomly selected one of the blawgs listed in the article, and a quick look at some of Geeklawyers blawgroll lists the following:
The only problem is, Alex Wade doesn't seem to have bothered actually doing any proper research. They've decided that only staff at law firms are likely to blog, or have any knowledge of the law, thereby ruling out advocates / barristers, academic law professionals, support staff / librarians, students.... There are lots of law blogs out there, by all sorts of people working in the law, all it takes to find them is a few minutes!
I randomly selected one of the blawgs listed in the article, and a quick look at some of Geeklawyers blawgroll lists the following:
- Bar Council Blogs
- Batgirl was a librarian
- Binary Law
- CharonQC
- Conflict of Laws
- Corporate Blawg
- Current Awareness
- Family Law
- Free Movement
- Head of Legal
- Human Law
- Impact
- IPKat
- Law Outsider
- Lawclanger
- Legal Beagle
- Legal Spy
- lo-fi librarian
- Martin George
- Open Content Lawyer
- Pink Tape
- PJH Law
- Publawyer
- Pupillage and How to Get It
- Ruthieslaw
Comments
Being serious - we shall just have to attend to our promotion of blogs...
I am cancelling my subscription to the Times of course and shall be referring to this preposterous report by Wade in my Postcard from The Bounty this weekend
Charon QC
from The Boat, Chelsea
Though I am very Glad to see Mr GeekLawyer mentioned the whole Times piece is poorly thought through and extremely shody.
I am a bit cross.